SuperMaru
Your comment could easily be construed as "Please lower the price so I can buy more despite the goal of the protocol for widespread adoption and use."
The party ends without continued acquisition of new OHMies.
The issue of inflation, compounded by top heavy distribution, is not caused by weak hands. In fact, the small Ohmies holding strong are the ones most punished by heavy selling.
According to the staking contract: https://etherscan.io/token/0x04f2694c8fcee23e8fd0dfea1d4f5bb8c352111f#balances
As of this writing, and removing the top 3 addresses as they are contracts, there are 9,750 sOHM holders that are currently staking 575,271 OHM
The top 500 addresses (top 5%) hold 413,661 sOHM or 71.9% which averages to 827 sOHM per staker
The remaining 95% of OHMies, the bottom 9,250 addresses, hold the remaining 29.1% (161,610) which averages to 17 sOHM per staker.
What's your guess on whether the majority of sell pressure is from the 5% of holders that control over 70% of sOHM or the 95% that are trying to believe in (3,3)?
Another lens - at the current rebase yield of 0.4793% - anyone in the top 5% that holds on average 827 sOHM gets 3.96 OHM per rebase or approximately 11.89 OHM/day or 70% of the average 17 OHM held by the other 95% of holders.
In other demographic news, the top 100 addresses (the 1%) hold 258,649 sOHM or 45% of the staked supply.