KO-XD
Totally agree with this input. The agreement if any should be code based. Sending 25k OHM in a hope of not getting screwed by "old system" agreement (paper contract) seems non-intuitive for the anon based DAO (who will even sign this agreement on the other side, CEO of Olympus, Zeus? /jk not joke) .
Zeus
Here: "I do agree strongly with the governance power piece, but listing is in my opinion is inevitable whether we like it or not. What we can do, however, is keep things on our own terms."
I think giving out 25k OHM loan is just confirming that "we" actually like it. And I'm not sure that it's the terms I would personally agree to.
Wild west example from hell: big exchange gets deposit of ohm, promises (3,3) to customers, immediately stakes all deposited into (3,3)(to fulfill the promise), opens future markets, some "independent whale" open shorts, starts sale of staking rewards, price crashes, "independent whale" makes few millions, exchange buys back ohm with much lower price. Profit? This is inevitable at some point. I just don't want to loan 25 000 OHM from treasury to see this play sooner than later.