Last proposal I specifically stated I did not think people were acting in bad faith. It's hard to still hold that position now when you pull this kind of shit.
The core objection with the last proposal was that DAO funds were being used for charity. It doesn't matter whether those funds come from the treasury, or from future yields, or from some other source, they are DAO controlled funds. It doesn't matter whether at the end the original sOHM is reclaimed and Gitcoin only keeps the future yield.
And it certainly doesn't matter that you have chosen to refer to the exact same donation to Gitcoin, which you acknowledged was a charitable donation in your last post, as a 'strategic partnership' now.
The last vote had an option for moving forward with amendments. Less than 10% of people voted for it. Meanwhile over 60% of people voted for 'do nothing'. Yet here you are less than 24 hours later, moving forward with amendments. This shows incredible disrespect for the DAO governance process, for Ohmies and their beliefs, and a willfull blindness to the core principles of the arguments opposing your initiatives.
I am voting against, and further I will be drafting and proposing an OIP banning the use of any DAO controlled funds (treasury, future yields, or otherwise) from ever being used for charitable purposes in the future.