- Edited
Vendor v1 has been live for almost a year with OHM having already had a pilot program of $500k which was instantly borrowed at max capacity. V2, while new, has been deployed for a little while now with no issues. I understand the concern of it being newer but the changes make things more Capital efficient and more transparent fee structure. We have had an audit as you allude too and have done everything to ensure safety of the contracts including internal testing and peer reviews of the code.
An initial deployment with 500k was already done via v1, proving more capacity is needed for the v2.
It looks like you are in favor of Cooler with a capacity of 69m, yet it has not been launched or tested, so this is confusing to me regarding the reluctancy.