unbanksy33 I understand and value your perspective regarding the necessity of borrowing solutions for OHM. However, when contemplating the allocation of $5 million into a newly released v2, which currently only possesses $250k in TVL and lacks extensive testing, it becomes essential to evaluate the potential risks and rewards. It is also crucial to bear in mind that even seemingly minor alterations of the smart contract can significantly impact its security and might also open up new attack vectors.
To mitigate the associated risks and adopt a more cautious approach, I suggest that our investment be contingent upon Vendor achieving specific milestones. For example, we could initiate our deployment with $100k, already representing a 40% of their total v2 TVL. Subsequently, as Vendor v2 attains predetermined thresholds, such as reaching $1 million TVL (excluding our investment), we can gradually increase our commitment.
By adopting this approach, we can effectively monitor the development and stability of the v2 platform while minimizing our exposure during its initial stages. Implementing milestones linked to Vendor's performance enables us to establish a measured and responsible investment strategy.
