delta6111

delta6111 · Jan 22, 2022

Thank you, this is a good innovation because its more structural than crude buybacks, and avoids having the DAO conduct open marker ops directly, which is important for reducing arbitrariness. Gives the market some properly defined expectations to respond to.

The APY flywheel alone is no longer as psychologically reassuring as investor protection, given the ongoing APY reduction. This would be good.

One query - Currently when a bond is sold, OHM is accrued to the DAO. How would this work in the case of inverse bonds?

delta6111 · Nov 25, 2021

Supportive, with one point of curiosity - given that ETH is also included here, how does this tie in with OIP40 on allocating 33% of RFV as ETH?

delta6111 · Nov 2, 2021

gnostication it would take 28 projects using the full 250k for us to get to 1% of current-day treasury in spend.

But the gains in terms of positive-sum interactions, and the differentiation from the ohm forks, are all incredible value drivers, the risk-reward is lopsided

delta6111 · Nov 1, 2021

Baitfish seems like we would be incubating projects right from the start, until the risk money comes in.

delta6111 · Oct 30, 2021