Tho I think there are more efficient ways but getting more liquidity + voting power in the Curve ecosystem is a step in the right direction for the long term development of OHM. What is the initial target allocation?
MiaoShi
- Feb 15, 2022
- Joined Oct 16, 2021
Directionally seems to be a no brainer, minimal marginal cost with ample benefits (i.e. treasury diversification/expansion, liquidity thus income raising). Magnitude-wise, want to ask (1) the rate at which we are earning TOKE and (2) how much incremental liquidity we are raising with this 900 OHM. Thank you! @JaLa
Voted yes, question, what particular info/evaluation we are looking to get from this piliot?
I really like the framework thinking initiative. Just a few questions on the logic reasoning before I vote: 1. you mention that "Liquity scored well in this regard". It seems it is outside of the blue "safe" zone from my glance, wondering how does this benchmark against other whitelisted protocols. 2. I want to ask if we have any existing frameworks gauging return/benefits vs. risks. Then my follow up question is that how does the quantified returns from depositing/staking in Liquity benchmark against other whitelisted protocols. Thank you sir. @irc
I'm new to this protocol, but as a money manager in the traditional finance scene, I am personally a big advocate for establish clear/logical frameworks (like this proposal) which will decision making and treasury management much more efficient going forward, especially as we are growing fast.
Directionally agree as ETH for sure will be the relevant basket of "good" in the context of reserve currency, though I want to think more about the 5% target.
Think this move (option1) is well aligned with both the short-term goal (wealth creation) and long-term vision given the importance of ETH