"We're a product of their efforts - without them, there would be no liquidity to own. We are builders and must support current and incoming builders as well as supporting efforts that impact the society we share."
This I totally agree with, and I can totally see the value in the concept of Olympus Give as a proposal.
At a structural level, there are too many different concepts rolled up in this proposal and its continued failure is an outcome of this. I would love to have seen a separate proposal around the concept of Olympus Give itself divested of any of the mechanics in the current proposal. The idea of creating what is fundamentally a foundation that the DAO funds and that then proposes Foundation funds to specific causes I would support, specifically because with each proposal I would be able to choose whether to move for or against Foundation funding - I don't like Gitcoin as a platform as I feel that it is both too easy to game and also too easy to create personal causes or crusades on (and also too easy to take already monetized causes and gain additional or unnecessary funding) - the utilisation of a strategic partnership mechanic under this proposal almost automatically made me a no.
The question of where the funding comes from for Olympus Give is an open one and should sit under a separate proposal post a vote for Olympus Give's inception - I would personally fund a foundation concept via rebases because I believe in the concept of giving back, however I would not support the concept of the DAO funding it separately because I do not believe that this is the DAO's core function.
Basically, conceptually creating a foundation like Olympus give, absolutely yes. Creating it in such a way that it can be in any way pointed at personal causes, no matter their validity, massive no. The DAO should never be put in a position where it can be pointed at anyone's personal causes, whether mine, Zeus' or whomever it might be - this proposal veers too close to that sun.
I'd love to see a way forward that delves further into how we conceptually make this work, I don't think we're going to do it with OIP-49A.