Questions:
1. Who is @ChefOmi? Never heard of them until a few hours ago. Is this being backed by core DAO team members as some type of stealth operation?
2. I understand that people are feeling that Sushi gets more from OHM than it gives back. However, this proposal, as written leaves a lot to be desired, for example:
-Where is the liquidity going to come from? How will it be incentivized?
-Does the team have the expertise and experience to run a DEX? It's about a lot more than just forking a protocol and calling it a day
-Why burn the bridge with Sushi? They have added OHM as a key routing pair, and seem pretty supportive. This move feels exploitative and is exactly the type of behavior I hear frowned upon when others do it to Olympus. Not a good look.
-What does this say to others looking to partner with Olympus in the future? We'll ride you until we're done and then turn around and say "screw you, bye, bye? Not a good look or stance
I echo others' concerns about this proposal. Who is this team? What are the guarantees? What does support look like? Isn't this just a marketing stunt to say this is connected to Olympus and then it's "bye-bye"
With a project started under these strange circumstances, it's hard to trust that this is a legitimate proposal being put forth by people who can actually do the job. Instead it feels like a hit and run operation to bootstrap a proposal with dubious motives and intent off the Olympus brand and community.
If they want to run a project like this, maybe lower the expectations and enter the Olympus launchpad project (if passed).