TropicalRogue I believe the users would only be able to delegate once and then the rewards are pro rata based on delegated votes.
I'm supportive as it appears a minimal risk for financial recovery.
TropicalRogue I believe the users would only be able to delegate once and then the rewards are pro rata based on delegated votes.
I'm supportive as it appears a minimal risk for financial recovery.
Aligns incentives and will hopefully bring a better outcome. I fully support this.
No brainer. Full support.
What will be the incentives for the people who will delegate the votes?
triangulair As written in the proposal, the incentives would be paid from the reimbursed amount, so whatever Fei's treasury ends up being composed of. They're currently voting to consolidate the Treasury and it is looking like they will be holding stables.
As a tribe holder I understand that I will receive less if I delegate my vote to you. Since you will be refunded even if you share a part of this refund, we will receive way less.
triangulair The point of the proposal is to ensure that is not the case. The incentive should be structured so that you would not receive less.
full support
Instead of making a smartcontract to give incentives to voters who vote in favor of full reimbursement, we can just commit to incentives to Tribe holders who vote in the favor. And we can decide and allocate a grand amount of incentives. Once vote passes in favor and everybody gets their fair share from feirari, we can do analytics of-chain and distribute incentives. Just like retrospective airdrops are calculated and distributed
smartboy21 We would allocate incentives to holders that delegate before the vote is live, to maximize outcome for everyone and make sure people don't just pile on at the end if we win the vote and with that reduce incentives for others.
As for the smart contract side, we would definitely prefer this being automated and everything on-chain, trying to make this as trustless as possible.