ty for the reply ser.
#1 Its nice to see this score card. I guess in my mind utility / use of OHM holds more weight than revenue currently. This is because revenue is never realised. This however I think is an education problem on my end and others. We assume like the revenue when number go up on underlying tokens, in a bad market we want all revenue rfv. I think once we have a framework to sell, this may get better.
#4 disclosures do not need to be cumbersome. As the projects grow, a lot of them will grow internally too (sub-daos, or other ohmies building), this should be disclosed if it happens from within the partnerships team. Any prior holdings of a potential partner should also be disclosed. This ties in with point #6.
#6 this is for our own partnerships team. I've spoken to them, I find them all high integrity, and I am proposing a bonus on top of any remuneration based on how well the partner projects do. This will encourage the team working on these deals and also for them to go out and scout for more. Right now we are getting an amazing deal flow, this may not be the case always as funds fight for allocations.
ty ser. Yes, the meatspace representation is high. Would love to see folks showing off their crypto relevance more than meatspace. Nothing against the meatspace folks, I was in one too.❤
For the last point, yes, I agree the team is great. I am proposing incentives aligned and top of current, based on performance of the team measured in project performance on a big enough timeframe (6, 12 months etc.). We all know the market is down, hence everything down, yet some projects are really good. e.g. Huge fan of vesta & redacted.