LandofSmile
Thanks for your comments. On types of treasuries, we would want to see strong assets that are similar in profile to our own treasury (stables, blue chips, etc) -- exactly to your point about not introducing new risk to our treasury.
On communities, we're also aligned with this comment. The current thinking is that we'd probably gain some strong community members, but we have to be prepared for most/all of the target's community to dump. We have ways of doing that and have modeled them. This would be a key part of any specific proposal we would make for approval under this framework. check out "sell pressure" in the TO template.
Finally, to your last point, this OIP is not seeking a blanket authorization to make acquisitions. Rather, it is an attempt to align the community more broadly on one type of acquisition we think would make sense to pursue. Although without a specific asset in mind it's hard to be more specific on the acquisition process, our hope is that by introducing this as a general topic we will have the space needed for exactly the type of conversation you're talking about.