wdOHM Simple proposal. DeFi Safety Review (https://docs.defisafety.com/finished-reviews/olympus-finance-process-quality-review) published their review of Olympus Finance to a failing score of 54% based on their criteria. It may be easy to address some of their prerequisites with some outreach. Services like this are only as good as the reputation we give them. That said, given the rapid expansion of new users and growth of the DAO's Treasury, I do not see the downside in addressing their review with a passing score provided it isn't too labor intensive or burdensome to the team. Thank you.
kschan wdOHM Hey, thanks for bringing this up. Although I am not familiar with DeFi Safety, i think your concern is valid. As this space is meant for OIP (see our guidelines on this), I would move this discussion to General instead.
e-gons Hi @kschan, bumping this up. I also recently came across Defi Safety after reading this great thread on DeFi safety/regulation by of the Yearn contributors. It seems worthy of the DAOs time to address the concerns raised in the DeFi Safety report. As the OP mentioned, the DAO could address many by updating docs and GitHub. Addressing these issues would simultaneously make it easier for new Ohmies to diligence the protocol and feel comfortable going (3,3).
