OIP-1555

111-altrektcrew

Ascertain if it is economically feasible for treasury to allow 3,3 r's to bond directly from sOHM and would community/dao support such a feature.
Being able to have a contract that let's us 3,3 r's go directly to bonding, cause we really are'nt selling -3,-3, Be able to go direct from sohm to bonds including protocol getting fee's but perhaps less slippage and not missing bond discounts time wise...
so basically we say, ok we want to bond with our sohm, protocol, returns ohm/dai or frax in slp or plain-(dai, frax or eth) in contract to allow direct bonding from sohm or just returns w/e bond u want via button possibly with a ([minimum say 100, max 500]) = open for discussion
wdyt?

If proposal is accepted move to a 3 day scattershot vote then if it passes, DEVs will create a fusion button that allows for direct sOHM to w/e BOND is desired
s->SLP(ohm/dai, ohm/frax) or s-->(dai, frax, eth)...

kschan

111-altrektcrew With bonding, you exchange other assets for OHM. With this proposal, you are proposing to exchange sOHM for other assets in the treasury (e.g. DAI, OHM-DAI LP tokens), which I think go against the protocol's goal to accumulate liquidity and build up the RFV of its treasury.

Also, I feel that this discussion need further deliberation before it should be put up for a Scattershot vote. I will move this proposal to the General section for now. Also, can you edit the post title? It is not a good idea to randomly assign an OIP number to a discussion.

BrianPeace

Does this mean that a bond automatically stakes as it vests? So rather than having to claim and stake every day or every epoch and spend gas on each of these transactions, it is all automated? If that is the proposal, and if such a thing is practical from a technical and financial perspective, then I like it. The main thing that prevents me from bonding is that gas fees for the multiple transactions would usually exceed any gain I would get from the bonding discount. Of course, we can't just pass off that expense onto the DAO. But if there is a gas-efficient way to auto stake as the bond vests, I would like that.

111-altrektcrew

BrianPeace had not thought of that .