- Edited
letters in this context the liquidity owned is treated as a producing asset, the rationale being that if ETH is safe enough for the DAO to hold, and rETH is safe enough for the DAO to hold, that holding a position in the liquidity pool should also be safe and would provide additional revenue. I think this would be separate from either the "DAO owned liquidity" and Olympus pro as the pair really has nothing to do with Olympus and isnt the result of a partnership
This might also be worthy of its own oip