bone I'm not certain that the 1:1 won't hold in the long run.
It's true that the alUSD redemptions via the transmuter depend on not everyone doing it at once, since the time to redemption depends on what % of the alUSD staked in the transmuter you have and what % of the transmuter's yield you can be redeemed with. However the alUSD3CRV pool is sufficiently liquid - particularly while rewards last - to ensure people exchange alUSD <> stables in the open market, instead of rushing to the transmuter. Alternatively people can repay their loans with alUSD or Dai, or liquidate a portion of their collateral. Only in a true bank rush, where everyone rushes to the transmuter, will it not maintain the peg, in my assessment.
I think this is a great proposal @JaLa and believe it would do good for both $OHM and $ALCX since both are vibrant communities of upstart protocols that both need broader ecosystem adoption of their tokens / stables.