New 3,3 winner distribution proposal

misuszatek

To give smaller investors a better chance to win, here is my suggestion. Add a further (a 4th) winner. 3 winners remain as now and the 4th place would be divided among 10-20 winners which have invested <= 1 sohm into the pool. In light of the very high eth gas fees, small investors would have a greater incentive to invest smaller amounts into the pool. In the pool are approx. 50% invested with 1 or less than 1 sohm. So the 4th place would be exclusive for small investors. This is similar to the tsunami pool on pooltogether.

What do you think about it?

Griff

Im a smaller investor so I like it! =D But honestly, idk.. seems like a much bigger deal for small ppl like us who have 1-5k, rather than whales. I think it strengthens the ideals of decentralization though, and helps to not aggregate wealth disparity. Maybe Im just looking for a handout though, It is up to the dao

LastBrohican86

3,3 Together is very quickly turning into "The Same 3 People Win". People are starting to figure out they're basically guaranteed to win with enough Ohm entered into the lottery. The same wallet has won the last 4 drawings in a row and another wallet has won twice. The wallet that has won 4 in a row appears to be simply adding the winnings from the last drawing into the new drawing, continually compounding their chances of winning.

LastBrohican86

https://imgur.com/gallery/aOFaYmL

rsd

LastBrohican86 where do you see the list of winners?

misuszatek

That's the proposal reason to modify the distribution rules.

LastBrohican86

rsd

All of the details can be seen here: https://app.pooltogether.com/prizes/mainnet/sOHM

rsd

another model could have different categories of winners pooled based on bid size:

500
100-499
10-99
1-9
0-0.999

and if larger investors think it's unfair.. skew it based on level.. so, those in >500 category win more..

LastBrohican86

2 more repeat winners in the last drawing on Nov 3. One had previously won in the Oct 28 drawing and the other had previously won in the Oct 16 drawing. Of the 9 winners in the last 3 drawings, 6 are repeat winners. The avg amount of Ohm entered into the drawing by these 6 wallets is 425.3 Ohm.

misuszatek

What do you think about a community voting to distribute the winner Pool in an other manner?

dqmail

Why not just take a random 10 winners and distribute the prize evenly across those 10? The way the pool prize is set up just makes the already wealthy even more wealthy.