Overall in favour of this proposal. Really like both protocols and think they add a lot of value to the econOHMy.
One suggestion/request would be: Is it possible to split the Vendor pilot deposit across both Mainnet and Arbitrum?
My argument being is that I believe there is a large population of Ohmies on Arbitrum in which funding a pool(s) on Vendor would be greatly beneficial for them. We all obviously know the excitement and hype surrounding Arbitrum currently and so I think for Olympus to start to grow a larger presence there it would further improve adoption and dispel the "Olympus is dead" perception (N.B. OHM is still ded).
However, I am also aware of the risks with bridging treasury assets from Mainnet to Arbitrum and in general having treasury assets "all over the place" (i.e. difficult to efficiently manage) (props to @Relwyn for the insightful discussions on this topic). As such I would understand if a straight 50/50 split across Mainnet and Arbitrum would not be a great idea. Therefore, I would instead propose something along the lines of:
- $400k pilot deposit on Mainnet
- $100k pilot deposit on Arbitrum
I think this also provides an opportunity to better discover and understand where the demand is across two of, if not the two, most used networks.
Personally I would prefer more of the Vendor deposit to be on Arbitrum; however, I am of course biased in this discussion as I pretty much exclusively operate on Arbitrum these days and such actions would greatly benefit me.
As such, if a split were to be a possibility I would defer to those with less bias to propose the exact terms.
Thanks for coming to my OHM Talk
